Once Again, It's the Economy !
Paul Krugman in a recent New York Times Op Ed piece had this to say about economic stimulus proposals of the top Democratic Presidential candidates (bolding & italics mine) ...
Hillary Clinton offered a ... somewhat larger
proposal than Edwards’ idea. It also includes aid to families having trouble
paying heating bills, which seems like a clever way to put cash in the hands of
people likely to spend it. The Edwards and
And you have to say that Mrs. Clinton seems comfortable with and
knowledgeable about economic policy. I’m sure the Hillary-haters will find some
reason that’s a bad thing, but there’s something to be said for presidents who
know what they’re talking about.
The Obama campaign’s initial response to the latest wave of bad economic news was, I’m sorry to say, disreputable: Mr. Obama’s top economic adviser claimed that the long-term tax-cut plan the candidate announced months ago is just what we need to keep the slump from “morphing into a drastic decline in consumer spending.” Hmm: claiming that the candidate is all-seeing, and that a tax cut originally proposed for other reasons is also a recession-fighting measure — doesn’t that sound familiar?
Anyway, on Sunday Mr. Obama came out with a real stimulus plan. As was the case with his health care plan, which fell short of universal coverage, his stimulus proposal is similar to those of the other Democratic candidates, but tilted to the right.
For example, the Obama plan appears to contain none of the alternative
energy initiatives that are in both the Edwards and
In short, the stimulus debate offers a pretty good portrait of the men and woman who would be president. And I haven’t said a word about their hairstyles.
Positively,
Carolan


Comments